The Chinese military returned an unmanned submersible to the US military in the South China Sea on Tuesday. The submarine was discovered by a Chinese navy salvage ship on the South China Sea on Thursday and taken away as an unknown device for identification. The United States said that the incident occurred 50 nautical miles from Subic Bay in the Philippines, and said that the Chinese side "does not comply with international law."
The Chinese and American military have exercised restraint in dealing with this matter, so that things will be resolved within a few days. This reflects the fact that the two governments and the two militaries have different understandings of the situation in the South China Sea, but both sides are willing to resolve disputes in a cooperative manner. They do not want to occasionally escalate into a crisis in the absence of control.
Some media in the United States questioned that the performance of the US military was "too soft" and claimed that letting things go this way would damage the confidence of regional allies in the United States. Individual US media even advocated asking China to apologize.
To express emotions, the mood of Chinese society is much larger than that of the United States. In the eyes of the Chinese public, the US side's exploration of marine intelligence around China is a serious threat to China's national security. Although the location of the incident is not in China's territorial waters, it is not many times closer to China than to the United States. If the US believes that it is important for the United States to engage in military intelligence activities there, then it should be thought that the Chinese have higher concerns about what is happening in that area.
Although the Chinese media did not speculate on this matter, the simple feeling of many Chinese people is that the submarine should not be returned to the United States. Of course, we know that things cannot be based solely on the ideas of our side. Therefore, we respect the decisions made by the Chinese diplomatic team and the military and accept the compromise reached between the Chinese and the US.
Data map: US ships are recycling unmanned submersibles
Sino-US exchanges must not only conform to international law, but also be as reasonable as possible when the actions of both sides are legal. The US military gathers intelligence around China, and whether it does not conform to international law, it constitutes actual damage to China's interests. This kind of aggressiveness at the doorstep of others is clear at a glance. China is unlikely to be the reconnaissance tentacles of the United States, and we are insensitive and unresponsive.
Sino-US military frictions have occurred almost everywhere in China, and most of them occur between the US reconnaissance system and China's resistance to their reconnaissance. The two sides always insist on the "professional" issue when friction occurs. Because international law does not have such provisions, it can only avoid incidents through the control of the Chinese and US military.
However, as long as the US military's overall strategy for China's approach to reconnaissance remains unchanged, the games at close range between the two sides cannot be reduced, and the dispute between the two sides may arise from time to time. There is no such thing as a tough display by the Chinese side. The Chinese side will never hope that the United States will conduct "environmental reconnaissance" on the periphery of China and endanger the safety of Chinese submarines. This attitude will not change in the future. What China and the United States need to do is probably to face each other's attitude and patiently work together.
The US must be clear that it is a strategic attacker in these disputes, and China is a strategic defender. In this situation, the US cannot force China to be too much. This is something Washington can't forget without much advantage.
It is very ridiculous that the Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yu Yiwei asked China to "interpret the international community with the submarine event." Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying replied, "Japan is too worried, this matter and the Japanese side. does it matter". The Japanese side jumped higher than anyone else, becoming a "small person who was too small, wanted to see more excitement, and even wanted to get started." Some people on the Internet in Japan asked that China returned the submersible to the United States. If it is a submersible of Japan, will China still return it? This kind of mentality is really funny. Let the Japanese personally try it out and the answer will be clear.
Peace in the Asia-Pacific region requires cooperation between China and the United States. The more differences between the two countries, the more important the cooperation between the two sides. Public opinion can come from temper, but Chinese and American officials must show a sense of responsibility and be the guardian of peace and stability.
Related reading: US unmanned submersibles were captured by China: then Trump was worried
Chamber Cold And Thermal Shock Test Chamber
Chamber Cold And Thermal Shock Test Chamber,Cold Thermal Shock Test Machine,Battery Thermal Shock Test Chamber,Thermal Performance Testing Test Chamber
Wuxi Juxingyao Trading Co., Ltd , https://www.juxingyao.com