The layout of the printed circuit board determines the success or failure of all power supplies, determining functionality, electromagnetic interference (EMI), and performance when heated. Switching power supply layout is not magic, not difficult, but in the initial design stage, it may often be overlooked. However, because both functional and EMI requirements must be met, arrangements that are beneficial to the stability of the power supply are often beneficial in reducing EMI emissions, so it is better to do it later. It should also be mentioned that designing a good layout from the beginning does not incur any cost, and in fact saves money because there is no need for EMI filters, mechanical shielding, time-consuming EMI testing, and modification of the PC board.
This article refers to the address: http://
Furthermore, when multiple DC/DC switching mode regulators are connected in parallel to achieve current sharing and greater output power, potential interference and noise issues may deteriorate. If all regulators operate at similar frequencies (switches), the total energy produced by multiple regulators in the circuit is concentrated at one frequency. The presence of this energy can be a concern, especially if the PCs and other ICs on other system boards are close together and are susceptible to this radiant energy. In automotive systems, this problem can be particularly troublesome because automotive systems are densely packed and often close to audio, RF, CAN buses, and various radar systems.
Respond to switching regulator noise radiation problem
In automotive environments, switching regulators are often used in places where heat dissipation and efficiency are important to replace linear regulators. In addition, the switching regulator is typically the first active component on the input power bus and therefore has a significant impact on the EMI performance of the entire converter circuit.
There are two types of EMI radiation: conductive and radiative. Conductive EMI depends on the wires and circuit traces that are connected to a product. Since the noise is limited to a particular terminal or connector in the design of the solution, then with the good layout or filter design described above, it is often possible to ensure compliance with conducted EMI requirements early in the development process.
However, radiative EMI is another matter. All components carrying current on the board radiate an electromagnetic field. Each trace on the board is an antenna, and each copper plane is a resonator. In addition to a pure sine wave or DC voltage, any signal produces noise that covers the entire signal spectrum. Even after careful design, the designer will never really know how severe the radiated EMI will be before the system is tested. And it is impossible to formally conduct a radiated EMI test until the design is basically completed.
The filter can attenuate the intensity at a certain frequency or over the entire frequency range to reduce EMI. Part of the energy propagates through the space (radiation), so metal shields and magnetic shields can be added to attenuate. The portion of the PCB trace (conducted) can be controlled by adding ferrite beads and other filters. EMI cannot be completely eliminated, but can be attenuated to acceptable levels for other communications and digital components. In addition, several regulatory agencies enforce standards to ensure compliance with EMI requirements.
New input filter assemblies using surface mount technology perform better than through-hole assemblies. However, this improvement is offset by an increase in the switching frequency of the switching regulator. Faster switching produces higher efficiency, shorter minimum on and off times, and therefore higher harmonic components. With all other parameters such as switching capacity and switching time remaining the same, the EMI is degraded by 6 dB for every doubling of the switching frequency. Broadband EMI behaves like a first-order high-pass filter, which increases 20dB of radiation if the switching frequency is increased by a factor of 10.
Experienced PCB designers will design the hotspot loop to be small and keep the shielded layer as close as possible to the active layer. However, the device pinout configuration, package construction, thermal design requirements, and the package size required to store sufficient energy in the decoupling component determine the minimum size of the hotspot loop. To complicate matters, in a typical planar printed circuit board, magnetic or transformer-type coupling above 30 MHz between traces will offset all filter efforts because the higher the harmonic frequency, the unwanted magnetic coupling Become more effective.
A new solution to these EMI problems
The solution to a reliable and truly EMI problem is to place the entire circuit in a shielded box. Of course, doing so increases costs, increases board space requirements, makes thermal management and testing more difficult, and results in additional assembly costs. Another method that is often used is to slow the edges of the switch. Doing so can produce an undesirable result, which is to reduce efficiency, increase the minimum on and off times, and generate related dead time, which is detrimental to the speed that the current control loop can achieve.
Linear Technology recently introduced the LT8614SilentSwitcher regulator, which eliminates these shortcomings by eliminating the need for a shielded box and providing the desired shielding effect. See Figure 1. The LT8614 also features world-class low IQ with an operating current of only 2.5μA. This is the total supply current that the device consumes during no-load regulation.
figure 1
T8614SilentSwitcher minimizes EMI/EMC radiation
The device's ultra low dropout voltage is limited only by the internal top switch. Unlike other solutions, the LT8614's RDSON is not limited by the maximum duty cycle and minimum disconnect time. The device skips the switch-off period when a voltage differential occurs and only performs the minimum required turn-off period to keep the internal top-switching boost-level voltage continuously available, as shown in Figure 6.
At the same time, the LT8614's minimum input operating voltage is typically only 2.9V (up to 3.4V), allowing the device to provide 3.3V rails with a dropout voltage. The LT8614 is more efficient than the LT8610/11 at high currents because of its small overall switching resistance. The device can also be synchronized to external frequencies from 200kHz to 3MHz.
The device's AC switching losses are low, so it can operate at high switching frequencies with minimal loss of efficiency. A good balance can be achieved in EMI-sensitive applications, such as those common in many automotive environments, and the LT8614 can be below the AM band (to achieve even lower EMI) or higher than the AM band. jobs. In settings with a working switching frequency of 700kHz, the standard LT8614 demo board does not exceed the noise floor of the CISPR25-Calls5 measurement.
The measurement results shown in Figure 2 were obtained in an anechoic chamber and under the following conditions: 12Vin, 3.3Vout/2A, and a fixed switching frequency of 700kHz.
The LT8614 and LT8610 were tested to compare the LT8614 with SilentSwitcher technology to the LT8610, another current switching regulator. The test was performed in a GTEM cell and the measurement of both devices used a standard demo board with the same load, input voltage and the same inductor.
It can be seen that the LT8614 with LT8614SilentSwitcher technology achieves up to 20dB improvement over the already excellent EMI performance of the LT8610, especially in the more difficult to manage high frequency range. This allows for a simpler, more compact design, and the overall design of the LT8614 switching power supply requires less filtering than other sensitive systems.
Pmic Hot Swap Controllers,Pmic Hot Swap Controllers Ec-Mart,Management Pmic Hot Swap Controllers,Hot Swap Voltage Controllers
Shenzhen Kaixuanye Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.icoilne.com